Russian state news agency misuses Barents Observer in fake news story
Updated March 11th with RIA Novosti’s disclaimer (see end of article for screen shot).
The Barents Observer last month reported on the tiny trace of radioactive iodine-131 measured across Europe. First noticed in Norway’s Pasvik valley, the isotope was soon found in Rovaniemi in Finland and later on in Poland, Germany, the Czech Republic, France and Spain.
The incident was widely covered by media-outlets in Europe, the Middle East and Russia.
State owned RIA Novosti, the Russian language domestic arm of Kremlin’s media news agency Rossiya Segodnya, took the story a bit further.
«It is known that at the Ukrainian nuclear power plants there are serious problems with centralized management and execution of the norms and standards of work,» RIA Novosti and Komsomolskaya Pravda are citing the Independent Barents Observer.
The quote is fake and has never existed in the Barents Observer article on the radiation leak. In fact, the Barents Observer article don’t mention Ukraine at all in the article.
RIA Novosti does not provide any evidence at all to support the claim that the iodine-131 radiation is coming from Ukraine. No other European publication has reported that the leak originated in Ukraine.
The fake Barents Observer quote was first published in Komsomolskaya Pravda, in an article mixing up different sources, but claiming, without providing evidents, that the contaminated cloud came from Ukraine.
Barents Observer’s article, however, is not pointing the finger of blame at any installation or country, except quoting Astrid Liland, Head of section for emergency preparedness at the Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority, who said it could “come from Eastern Europe.”
It was the site StopFake.org that first collected the overview of Russian articles wrongfully spreading the information that Ukraine was to blame for the radiation leak.
Last month, Russia’s Foreign Ministry rolled out its new Fake News web-site aimed to debunk untrue stories in Western media.
Barents Observer article update, March 11th:
Also, Komsomolskaya Pravda has now (cheked on March 12th) removed the quote from the Barents Observer.